When instructors lament that their students are not willing to complete their reading assignments, they often cite their students' seeming inability to say anything sophisticated or critical about the reading as evidence for their claim. But does a student's underwhelming performance in class necessarily indicate that they did not do the reading? Or could it, instead, be a sign that such students are "reading" without knowing what they are supposed to be gleaning from the act?
The readings that we assign in our courses are shaped—often strongly—by disciplinary and/or generic conventions that may be unfamiliar, or even inscrutable, to some of our students. As such, it's entirely possible that our students are reading for completion without developing the kind of critical response to the reading that we would hope. Here are some steps that you can take to make sure that your students are reading with profit:
-
Query prior knowledge. At the start of the semester, briefly preview the kinds of materials that students will be reading, and make a point of highlighting the ways they may differ from the texts with which students may be most familiar (e.g. from their secondary school courses). Survey your students about the breadth of their reading. What degree(s) of preparation are your students bringing to the genres represented in your course? Have they read these kinds of materials before/recently? In addition to giving you and your teaching staff valuable background, a survey of this nature will alert your undergraduates to the fact that they may need to seek out support in reading certain genres of assigned texts during the semester.
-
Model expert reading. Presumably you are a good representative of the kind of reader you would like your students to be/become. So, show them how you read! You might do this in different ways:
-
Guide students through a close reading of a passage. You could do this synchronously, in class, by projecting or distributing a handout containing a representative passage and reading it out loud together, pausing to narrate aloud your inner monologue as you read. You might also do this asynchronously, by posting a video, or using annotation tools (see below). In either case, the goal is to model for students the hidden "moves" that an expert reader makes when confronting material in your field or discipline.
-
Use an online annotation tool. Harvard offers access to AnnotationsX and Perusall, which allow you and your students to comment directly on a shared text, to respond to each others’ annotations, and to reflect on your experience of reading in real time. This can be an occasion for modeling expert reading, or for diagnosing what your students already do and don’t know to look for.
-
Focus class discussions on form as well as content. When discussing readings in class, remember to emphasize how they work (i.e. as technologies of exposition and persuasion) as well as what they say. Literature courses aren't the only places where students can profit from close reading a text. Look for opportunities in the course of your lectures and class discussions to pause and take a deep dive into how a text is saying what it is saying. Are there certain rhetorical techniques an author employs to produce a desired effect in the reader? How have the authors of a scientific paper employed scale, color, and other graphic design choices to steer a reader toward their preferred interpretation of a figure?